Contact Us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. 


Tampere
Finland

(+358) 50 344 8489

One year with Sony Alpha cameras and ZEISS E-mount lenses. Developing my own photographic eye in a in a scratch book manner. Hunting the stream of inspiration and sharing it through a popular blog platform.
This is what 'Days of Zeiss' is all about.

Journal

 

 

Loxia dreams

Toni Ahvenainen

Sony A7 & ZEISS Loxia 2/50 – f/2.0, 1/1250sec, ISO100, raw Photograph by Toni Ahvenainen

Sony A7 & ZEISS Loxia 2/50 – f/2.0, 1/1250sec, ISO100, raw
Photograph by Toni Ahvenainen


In previous post I told you about the Zeiss Loxia 2/35 having a weak corner at wide open (soft veil at f/2) but how I still found myself coming back to it again and again because of its unique rendering. When it comes to Zeiss Loxia 2/50 I can tell you that it doesn't have similar weakness wide open and it is mighty sharp already at f/2. Being a Planar design it also has a pretty flat focus field which emphasizes good corner performance. But does it have that same unique rendering which makes the Loxia 2/35 so interesting? I have to say that it definitely has a same kind of 'classic character' in its rendition, but I feel it isn't as strong as with the Loxia 2/35 – or maybe I just haven't found the sweet spot yet. Again this character can be recognized by the three dimensional separation, certain kind of bokeh and a strong contrast. To exemplify this rendition character I decided to share a picture I took already approximately one year ago when I got to test the Loxia 2/50 for a short time. We were on lake shore with Aura on a rainy day and I snapped this picture when she was eyeing the scenery – seeing this image later on at home I knew I would love this lens, but much to my grief I had to send the lens back as it was just on loan for a quick test.    

The image quality of the Loxia lenses is, of course, an interesting topic, but I feel the essence of these lenses lies in a way how they change one's approach to photography. Loxia lenses force me to slow down, connect me better with the photography and think more about the situation on hand. It's a different kind of photographic experience and I believe it also convoys to pictures themselves too. Interestingly, while I find myself preferring the Loxias I still shoot more with autofocus lenses (but often think about how my photography would change if I only had the Loxias). This is of course a question of convenience in some cases, but I also feel that I'm hunting different kind of images with Loxias. My photographic eye works differently when I'm operating with manual focus and I also believe it's one reason why I prefer using Loxias especially when shooting family photography and my two daughters. While the classic rendition of these lenses work perfectly with that kind of images, I think they will essentially work anywhere where there is a certain humanistic human interest involved. I understand that for some it's just about 'getting pictures' and they might find it hard to understand why some might still prefer manual focusing, but for discerning photographers it's a different path to another kind of sceneries in a rich world of photography.